Human quirks make timeboxing work …

I’ve heard dozens of good reasons for time-boxing iterations, or Sprints, since I started reading up on agile methodologies, but found some real food for thought in Craig Larman’s book Agile & Iterative Development.

Parkinson’s law states that “Work expands so as to fill the time available for it” … something I’ve definitely experienced myself very recently! The flip side is that where there is a specific timebox, work can and will fit in (up to a point, obviously!). Personally, I know this is true for me – I work faster and am more motivated if my work has deadlines.

Expanding work wasn’t such a new concept for me, but the second point was something I’d never considered before: “People remember slipped dates, not slipped features”. Deliver on time with 75% of the features, and the project will be remembered as a success. Deliver a month late with 100% of the features, and it will be considered a failure. Strange quirk … but I can identify with it!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>